1. The
article written by Nicholas Carr claims that the overuse of the Internet in
place of reading print is changing the way we think. In the past, we have taken
the time to analyze, discuss and store information. Now, we spend our time
memorizing quick bits of information from the Internet. The Internet provides
us with everything we want, but with all of that it contributes to a large
amount of distraction. The Internet continues to grow and it is slowly wiping
out our interest to dive into a book or article. We are turning into machines
searching for the website source to help us process information.
2. The
websites we go to every day have made it much simpler for us to find
information, so our tendency to search through a dictionary, newspaper or
encyclopedia is diminishing. The Internet is slowly tearing us apart from deep
thought, comprehension and reflection; we are becoming uninterested. The
Internet is slowly rewiring our minds from thinking deep to quick memorization.
3. Literacy
is defined almost the same thing, but there is a stronger danger in print, not
speech. Literacy is defined as being able to think about and analyze print over
a generous amount of time as opposed to skimming and article over a few
minutes.
4/5. The
Internet has changed the processes of thought and reading. We are prone to skip
over the depth and the meaning now and just look at the surface structure. This
pulls away from the depth of the writing and just brings one to conclude that
the simple words are all that matter.
6/7. The
author uses older changes in technology to demonstrate what people thought
about changes similar to this and how they actually turned out such as the
transition to mechanical clocks. He also brings up how changes in medium change
the way we write and read just like how Nietzsche changed what he wrote when he
changed how he wrote. And finally he brought up HAL and how it was more
emotional, more human, than the actual humans because the actual humans lost
the reasoning skills of deep thought. This evidence was very effective for the reason
that it showed relevance throughout different situations and examples. It was
different but it all helped prove a different part of the same point.
8. The overall answer to the “so what” question is that
the Internet is frying our brains and it is leading us into a world of full
technology where we are slowly losing our ability to find depth and true
meaning. The more we rely on this technology, the more we begin to lose depth.
No comments:
Post a Comment